Is The World Running Out Of Oil ?  

Posted by Big Gav

The Australian Bureau of Transport and Regional Economics examined the arguments for and against the likelihood of a near term peak in oil production and produced this paper (pdf) earlier this year - its quite a good summary of the arguments on both sides - but doesn't try to decide which camp is correct.

There are two very distinct schools of thought on the question of whether we are running out of oil. The ‘peak theorists’/depletionists argue that half the world’s oil supplies have been used and oil production has peaked or is about to peak, signalling a near-term crisis across world economies that will cause massive dislocations. The counter view, held by international energy agencies and other antidepletionists, is that while there are always uncertainties about reserve estimates, it is most likely we have only used around a quarter of world reserves and that the outlook for the next 30 years presents no cause for concern. Oil supplies, they argue, will keep pace with demand, as reflected in the expectation that long-term prices (in year 2000 dollars) are likely to be around $30 per barrel.

The depletionists base their work on the Hubbert curves and draw on M. King Hubbert’s prediction of the peaking of U.S. oil production in 1970s as testimony to the validity of their approach. They also focus on resources as a physical limit, calling on ‘the immutable physical laws of depletion’ to support their case and estimating ultimately recoverable resources (URR) at 1.8 trillion barrels. They predict that the downturn in oil production will be sudden and unanticipated, thrusting an unprepared world into economic and social turmoil.

The antidepletionists estimate a URR of over 3 trillion barrels and draw attention to the failed predictions of doom throughout history, starting in the early days of the ‘oil age’—around 1865.3 They point to the fact that world oil reserves have grown over the past 50 years faster than cumulative production due to discoveries and enhanced recovery techniques.

Technorati tags:

3 comments

This overly balanced reporting reminds me of Paul Krugman's example of the logical extreme for a headline:
"The Shape of the Earth: Views Differ."

BTW, For some reason I could not reach the PDF.

Take that back, it is available.

I like the Krugman headline.

It does take a fine sense of balance to sit on the fence - but it doesn't add much clarity to the debate.

I think the world has moved on since they wrote it anyway, but I thought it was interesting that various government departments have been considering the problem at least.

Post a Comment

Statistics

Locations of visitors to this page

blogspot visitor
Stat Counter

Total Pageviews

Ads

Books

Followers

Blog Archive

Labels

australia (619) global warming (423) solar power (397) peak oil (355) renewable energy (302) electric vehicles (250) wind power (194) ocean energy (165) csp (159) solar thermal power (145) geothermal energy (144) energy storage (142) smart grids (140) oil (139) solar pv (138) tidal power (137) coal seam gas (131) nuclear power (129) china (120) lng (117) iraq (113) geothermal power (112) green buildings (110) natural gas (110) agriculture (91) oil price (80) biofuel (78) wave power (73) smart meters (72) coal (70) uk (69) electricity grid (67) energy efficiency (64) google (58) internet (50) surveillance (50) bicycle (49) big brother (49) shale gas (49) food prices (48) tesla (46) thin film solar (42) biomimicry (40) canada (40) scotland (38) ocean power (37) politics (37) shale oil (37) new zealand (35) air transport (34) algae (34) water (34) arctic ice (33) concentrating solar power (33) saudi arabia (33) queensland (32) california (31) credit crunch (31) bioplastic (30) offshore wind power (30) population (30) cogeneration (28) geoengineering (28) batteries (26) drought (26) resource wars (26) woodside (26) censorship (25) cleantech (25) bruce sterling (24) ctl (23) limits to growth (23) carbon tax (22) economics (22) exxon (22) lithium (22) buckminster fuller (21) distributed manufacturing (21) iraq oil law (21) coal to liquids (20) indonesia (20) origin energy (20) brightsource (19) rail transport (19) ultracapacitor (19) santos (18) ausra (17) collapse (17) electric bikes (17) michael klare (17) atlantis (16) cellulosic ethanol (16) iceland (16) lithium ion batteries (16) mapping (16) ucg (16) bees (15) concentrating solar thermal power (15) ethanol (15) geodynamics (15) psychology (15) al gore (14) brazil (14) bucky fuller (14) carbon emissions (14) fertiliser (14) matthew simmons (14) ambient energy (13) biodiesel (13) investment (13) kenya (13) public transport (13) big oil (12) biochar (12) chile (12) cities (12) desertec (12) internet of things (12) otec (12) texas (12) victoria (12) antarctica (11) cradle to cradle (11) energy policy (11) hybrid car (11) terra preta (11) tinfoil (11) toyota (11) amory lovins (10) fabber (10) gazprom (10) goldman sachs (10) gtl (10) severn estuary (10) volt (10) afghanistan (9) alaska (9) biomass (9) carbon trading (9) distributed generation (9) esolar (9) four day week (9) fuel cells (9) jeremy leggett (9) methane hydrates (9) pge (9) sweden (9) arrow energy (8) bolivia (8) eroei (8) fish (8) floating offshore wind power (8) guerilla gardening (8) linc energy (8) methane (8) nanosolar (8) natural gas pipelines (8) pentland firth (8) saul griffith (8) stirling engine (8) us elections (8) western australia (8) airborne wind turbines (7) bloom energy (7) boeing (7) chp (7) climategate (7) copenhagen (7) scenario planning (7) vinod khosla (7) apocaphilia (6) ceramic fuel cells (6) cigs (6) futurism (6) jatropha (6) nigeria (6) ocean acidification (6) relocalisation (6) somalia (6) t boone pickens (6) local currencies (5) space based solar power (5) varanus island (5) garbage (4) global energy grid (4) kevin kelly (4) low temperature geothermal power (4) oled (4) tim flannery (4) v2g (4) club of rome (3) norman borlaug (2) peak oil portfolio (1)