Prius designer: It is time to end our oil addiction  

Posted by Big Gav in , ,

Bloomberg has an interesting (and long) article quoting the designer of the Prius saying that Toyota must lead the car industry in ridding itself of oil addiction.

Bill Reinert, who helped design Toyota Motor Corp.'s Prius hybrid, hovers in a helicopter 1,000 feet over Fort McMurray, Alberta. On this clear November morning, he's craning for a look at one of the world's largest petroleum reserves where there's not an oil well in sight.

Instead, in a 2-mile-wide pit below, trucks head to refineries with loads of sand weighing more than Boeing 747s. Yellow flames shoot skyward as 900-degree-Fahrenheit (482- degree-Celsius) heat liquefies any embedded petroleum. Floating scarecrows and propane-powered cannons do their best to chase migrating birds from lethal wastewater ponds.

Eventually, nuclear reactors may surround the crater 270 miles (435 kilometers) northeast of Edmonton, Alberta, delivering the power required to wring oil from sand.

``This is what the end of the age of oil means,'' says Reinert, 60, who plans the vehicles Toyota will make in a quarter century as national manager for advanced technology at the U.S. sales unit in Torrance, California. ``The car-based culture, the business-as-usual of building cars and trucks, is going to change dramatically.''

Since Henry Ford introduced the moving assembly line in 1913, the world's automakers have relied on a single source of power --the gasoline-dependent internal combustion engine.

Today, the twin threats of $100-a-barrel oil and global warming are convulsing an industry addicted to cheap, abundant petroleum. Auto companies, already hurt in 2007 by the lowest U.S. demand in a decade, are struggling to perfect cars that run on ethanol, diesel, natural gas, hydrogen and household electricity.

They're under the gun from California and more than a dozen other states to cut carbon exhaust by 2020 with vehicles that must get 44 miles per gallon (19 kilometers per liter) of gasoline, about double today's average. On Dec. 19, President George W. Bush signed a law that mandates fuel-efficiency of 35 mpg nationwide by that year.

Reinert says automakers are endangering themselves by basing sales and profits on the big, fast cars that many U.S. customers say they want in 2008.

In five years, as oil shortages and global warming intensify, car companies may be out of step with drivers' demands for fuel-efficient vehicles. Even worse, degrading stretches of the planet like Fort McMurray will only delay -- not prevent -- the time when the world must function in a post- peak-petroleum economy. ...

On the subject of oil free vehicles, Wired reports the long awaited Tesla roadsters are supposed to be released in March (yes - this year).
It's been a crazy few months at Tesla Motors, what with all those heads rolling and transmissions failing, but the company says it absolutely, positively will begin building the all-electric Roadster on March 17.

Tesla still hasn't gotten the transmission sorted out, so the first run will use an "interim" unit that, although robust enough to do the job, cuts the car's zero-to-60 time from 4.0 seconds to 5.7. That's a 42 percent drop - nothing to sneeze at when you're forking over $98,000 for a high-performance sports car.

Just how many cars will feature the temporary fix remains to be seen, but Tesla says its engineers have finally solved the transmission problem and later models will deliver on the 4-second promise. Tesla calls it DriveTrain 1.5.

So what's that mean for people who get cars with the Band-Aid?

Tesla is promising to retrofit earlier cars at no cost once it's sure DriveTrain 1.5 works. Those who get a Roadster early will find themselves getting a substantial boost in performance some time down the line.

Sn150254_2 The first two transmissions Tesla tried proved unreliable, and apparently the tranny in the car Motor Trend praised in its road test is only good for a few thousand miles. Tesla has decided to abandon the complex two-speed gearbox originally slated for the car. Instead, it has developed a one-speed transmission and improved power electronics module that sends more current to the motor, allowing it to produce more peak power. The company says the new design is lighter, more efficient and offers improved thermal performance and quarter-mile acceleration.

It's not an easy fix. The motor must be modified to improve its cooling capacity, and AutoblogGreen reports that Tesla is ditching the air-cooled motor in favor of a liquid-cooled one. Road testing of DriveTrain 1.5 could begin as early as next week.

Coincidentally, that's when the first production Tesla Roadster, dubbed P1, will be delivered to Elon Musk, the company's chairman. The company has cleared all the Environmental Protection Agency and Department of Transportation hurdles and says it will start building cars in England on March 17. Production will start slowly and ramp up through the summer once DriveTrain 1.5 is ready to go.

1 comments

Anonymous   says 1:59 PM

Notice that the proposed solutions increase the complexity of the system, and substitute the dependence on oil (to a limited degree) for other materials and long, high tech supply chains. For the Prius the gains for the additional complexity are marginal. The Roadster seems more of a luxurious novelty than a serious attempt at sustainability - although you may argue that the technical experience will trickle down to more pedestrian vehicles. A lifecycle energy analysis would be interesting for these cars.

There's a touch of hypocrisy in Reinert's observation of the tar sands. The Prius is hardly a revolutionary design solution either. With all the well documented societal disadvantages of personal motorised transport - oil free or not - shouldn't we be looking at the most robust, low-energy and sustainable solutions in the face of such an uncertain future? The stakes are enormous. High-tech cars may be a gamble that does not pay off.

Post a Comment

Statistics

Locations of visitors to this page

blogspot visitor
Stat Counter

Total Pageviews

Ads

Books

Followers

Blog Archive

Labels

australia (619) global warming (423) solar power (397) peak oil (355) renewable energy (302) electric vehicles (250) wind power (194) ocean energy (165) csp (159) solar thermal power (145) geothermal energy (144) energy storage (142) smart grids (140) oil (139) solar pv (138) tidal power (137) coal seam gas (131) nuclear power (129) china (120) lng (117) iraq (113) geothermal power (112) green buildings (110) natural gas (110) agriculture (91) oil price (80) biofuel (78) wave power (73) smart meters (72) coal (70) uk (69) electricity grid (67) energy efficiency (64) google (58) internet (50) surveillance (50) bicycle (49) big brother (49) shale gas (49) food prices (48) tesla (46) thin film solar (42) biomimicry (40) canada (40) scotland (38) ocean power (37) politics (37) shale oil (37) new zealand (35) air transport (34) algae (34) water (34) arctic ice (33) concentrating solar power (33) saudi arabia (33) queensland (32) california (31) credit crunch (31) bioplastic (30) offshore wind power (30) population (30) cogeneration (28) geoengineering (28) batteries (26) drought (26) resource wars (26) woodside (26) censorship (25) cleantech (25) bruce sterling (24) ctl (23) limits to growth (23) carbon tax (22) economics (22) exxon (22) lithium (22) buckminster fuller (21) distributed manufacturing (21) iraq oil law (21) coal to liquids (20) indonesia (20) origin energy (20) brightsource (19) rail transport (19) ultracapacitor (19) santos (18) ausra (17) collapse (17) electric bikes (17) michael klare (17) atlantis (16) cellulosic ethanol (16) iceland (16) lithium ion batteries (16) mapping (16) ucg (16) bees (15) concentrating solar thermal power (15) ethanol (15) geodynamics (15) psychology (15) al gore (14) brazil (14) bucky fuller (14) carbon emissions (14) fertiliser (14) matthew simmons (14) ambient energy (13) biodiesel (13) investment (13) kenya (13) public transport (13) big oil (12) biochar (12) chile (12) cities (12) desertec (12) internet of things (12) otec (12) texas (12) victoria (12) antarctica (11) cradle to cradle (11) energy policy (11) hybrid car (11) terra preta (11) tinfoil (11) toyota (11) amory lovins (10) fabber (10) gazprom (10) goldman sachs (10) gtl (10) severn estuary (10) volt (10) afghanistan (9) alaska (9) biomass (9) carbon trading (9) distributed generation (9) esolar (9) four day week (9) fuel cells (9) jeremy leggett (9) methane hydrates (9) pge (9) sweden (9) arrow energy (8) bolivia (8) eroei (8) fish (8) floating offshore wind power (8) guerilla gardening (8) linc energy (8) methane (8) nanosolar (8) natural gas pipelines (8) pentland firth (8) saul griffith (8) stirling engine (8) us elections (8) western australia (8) airborne wind turbines (7) bloom energy (7) boeing (7) chp (7) climategate (7) copenhagen (7) scenario planning (7) vinod khosla (7) apocaphilia (6) ceramic fuel cells (6) cigs (6) futurism (6) jatropha (6) nigeria (6) ocean acidification (6) relocalisation (6) somalia (6) t boone pickens (6) local currencies (5) space based solar power (5) varanus island (5) garbage (4) global energy grid (4) kevin kelly (4) low temperature geothermal power (4) oled (4) tim flannery (4) v2g (4) club of rome (3) norman borlaug (2) peak oil portfolio (1)