Biofuels Deemed a Greenhouse Threat  

Posted by Big Gav in , , , , ,

The New York Times has an article on some recent reports that current generation biofuels usually add to greenhouse emissions (biofuels produced from waste streams excepted of course), with the worst impact being felt when rainforest is cleared so that crops for biofuels can be planted. Hmmm - wasn't this obvious years ago ? Maybe they should have used my "From Rainforest to Biodiesel" tagline.

Almost all biofuels used today cause more greenhouse gas emissions than conventional fuels if the full emissions costs of producing these “green” fuels are taken into account, two studies being published Thursday have concluded.

The benefits of biofuels have come under increasing attack in recent months, as scientists took a closer look at the global environmental cost of their production. These latest studies, published in the prestigious journal Science, are likely to add to the controversy.

These studies for the first time take a detailed, comprehensive look at the emissions effects of the huge amount of natural land that is being converted to cropland globally to support biofuels development.

The destruction of natural ecosystems — whether rain forest in the tropics or grasslands in South America — not only releases greenhouse gases into the atmosphere when they are burned and plowed, but also deprives the planet of natural sponges to absorb carbon emissions. Cropland also absorbs far less carbon than the rain forests or even scrubland that it replaces.

Together the two studies offer sweeping conclusions: It does not matter if it is rain forest or scrubland that is cleared, the greenhouse gas contribution is significant. More important, they discovered that, taken globally, the production of almost all biofuels resulted, directly or indirectly, intentionally or not, in new lands being cleared, either for food or fuel.

“When you take this into account, most of the biofuel that people are using or planning to use would probably increase greenhouse gasses substantially,” said Timothy Searchinger, lead author of one of the studies and a researcher in environment and economics at Princeton University. “Previously there’s been an accounting error: land use change has been left out of prior analysis.” ...

The clearance of grassland releases 93 times the amount of greenhouse gas that would be saved by the fuel made annually on that land, said Joseph Fargione, lead author of the second paper, and a scientist at the Nature Conservancy. “So for the next 93 years you’re making climate change worse, just at the time when we need to be bringing down carbon emissions.”

The Intergovernment Panel on Climate Change has said that the world has to reverse the increase of greenhouse gas emissions by 2020 to avert disastrous environment consequences. ...

The European Union and a number of European countries have recently tried to address the land use issue with proposals stipulating that imported biofuels cannot come from land that was previously rain forest. But even with such restrictions in place, Dr. Searchinger’s study shows, the purchase of biofuels in Europe and the United States leads indirectly to the destruction of natural habitats far afield.

For instance, if vegetable oil prices go up globally, as they have because of increased demand for biofuel crops, more new land is inevitably cleared as farmers in developing countries try to get in on the profits. So crops from old plantations go to Europe for biofuels, while new fields are cleared to feed people at home.

Likewise, Dr. Fargione said that the dedication of so much cropland in the United States to growing corn for bioethanol had caused indirect land use changes far away. Previously, Midwestern farmers had alternated corn with soy in their fields, one year to the next. Now many grow only corn, meaning that soy has to be grown elsewhere.

Increasingly, that elsewhere, Dr. Fargione said, is Brazil, on land that was previously forest or savanna. “Brazilian farmers are planting more of the world’s soybeans — and they’re deforesting the Amazon to do it,” he said.

0 comments

Post a Comment

Ads

Ads

Statistics


referer referrer referers referrers http_referer

Locations of visitors to this page

Ads

Books

Followers

News

Loading...

Blog Archive

Labels

australia (515) global warming (314) peak oil (272) solar power (268) electric vehicles (168) wind power (144) smart grids (138) geothermal energy (133) ocean energy (129) csp (128) tidal power (118) solar thermal power (116) coal seam gas (113) nuclear power (109) iraq (106) oil (105) geothermal power (100) green buildings (99) china (98) renewable energy (92) lng (91) agriculture (81) natural gas (73) smart meters (72) solar pv (71) energy storage (70) oil price (70) biofuel (69) energy efficiency (59) uk (59) wave power (56) electricity grid (52) google (49) food prices (48) big brother (46) coal (46) internet (45) bicycle (40) thin film solar (39) ocean power (37) biomimicry (36) new zealand (34) air transport (33) shale gas (33) water (33) algae (32) canada (32) scotland (32) credit crunch (31) politics (31) queensland (31) bioplastic (30) concentrating solar power (30) surveillance (30) population (27) resource wars (26) batteries (25) california (25) censorship (25) cleantech (25) geoengineering (25) saudi arabia (25) cogeneration (24) ctl (23) drought (23) offshore wind power (23) bruce sterling (22) economics (22) woodside (22) arctic ice (20) coal to liquids (20) iraq oil law (20) origin energy (19) ultracapacitor (19) brightsource (18) indonesia (18) rail transport (18) santos (18) ausra (17) carbon tax (17) lithium (17) ucg (16) buckminster fuller (15) collapse (15) exxon (15) limits to growth (15) mapping (15) psychology (15) concentrating solar thermal power (14) geodynamics (14) iceland (14) michael klare (14) biodiesel (13) carbon emissions (13) cellulosic ethanol (13) distributed manufacturing (13) electric bikes (13) ethanol (13) fertiliser (13) investment (13) kenya (13) tesla (13) ambient energy (12) atlantis (12) cities (12) matthew simmons (12) public transport (12) victoria (12) al gore (11) biochar (11) brazil (11) energy policy (11) shale oil (11) texas (11) bees (10) desertec (10) fabber (10) goldman sachs (10) hybrid car (10) internet of things (10) terra preta (10) tinfoil (10) volt (10) alaska (9) amory lovins (9) biomass (9) carbon trading (9) cradle to cradle (9) esolar (9) gazprom (9) gtl (9) pge (9) severn estuary (9) sweden (9) toyota (9) afghanistan (8) big oil (8) bucky fuller (8) chile (8) eroei (8) fuel cells (8) guerilla gardening (8) linc energy (8) lithium ion batteries (8) methane hydrates (8) otec (8) relocalisation (8) us elections (8) western australia (8) antarctica (7) arrow energy (7) bloom energy (7) boeing (7) climategate (7) copenhagen (7) distributed generation (7) fish (7) floating offshore wind power (7) four day week (7) methane (7) nanosolar (7) vinod khosla (7) apocaphilia (6) bolivia (6) ceramic fuel cells (6) cigs (6) jatropha (6) jeremy leggett (6) local currencies (6) natural gas pipelines (6) nigeria (6) pentland firth (6) somalia (6) stirling engine (6) t boone pickens (6) chp (5) futurism (5) ocean acidification (5) saul griffith (5) varanus island (5) airborne wind turbines (4) garbage (4) kevin kelly (4) low temperature geothermal power (4) oled (4) scenario planning (4) space based solar power (4) tim flannery (4) v2g (4) club of rome (3) global energy grid (2) norman borlaug (2) peak oil portfolio (1)