Mission Impossible: Economic Biodiesel Production  

Posted by Big Gav in ,

Yet another Australian biodiesel producer has come to grief as a result of rising feedstock prices, with Mission Biofuels being the latest to give up (though they hoping to revive biofuel production using jatropha at a later date).

Mission Biofuels Ltd says current high feedstock prices make it unviable for to consistently produce biodiesel for the foreseeable future. Biofuel production has been criticised for creating ecological problems and diverting crops away from food supply, amid growing concern about global food shortages.

Biodiesel is made by combining alcohol with vegetable oil. Mission Biofuels is currently using crude palm oil but its goal is to ultimately replace this with an alternative feedstock - a Central American shrub, Jatropha, which the company cultivates in India for its inedible seeds that contain 30 per cent oil.

Crude palm oil remains the cheapest vegetable oil as the cost of rapeseed oil and soy oil have increased sharply, the company said. Mission Biofuels said in a statement that it would only produce biodiesel if it could do so profitably.

"This will only be possible if we can secure sufficient quantities of feedstock at reasonable prices or if we are able to achieve higher prices with our off-take partners in both the US and Europe," it said. "The company has been investigating several opportunities to secure moderate quantities of feedstock at reasonable prices which will allow us to produce and sell biodiesel on a jobbing basis."

It expects to produce and sell about 4,000 tonnes of biodiesel this month and is ramping up its production of pharmaceutical grade purified glycerine to occupy its biodiesel plant in Malaysia in between biodiesel production.

Mission Biofuels' wind power and feedstock businesses are performing well, and it plans to add more windmills, totalling 15-18 megawatts of generating capacity, to its business in coming years. The windmills will assist the company to substantially reduce its effective tax rate for its feedstock operations this financial year while generating tax-free income by producing saleable electricity for the next 10 years.

2 comments

Isn't this really in some ways another catch 22 situation?
The desire to produce biodiesel is governed by existing stock of engines...

Stirlings, steam and some of those chunky old (Lister?) engines don't need the biodiesel conversion.

Is this wrong?

I guess so - if burning biomass is more efficient than burning biodiesel.

Not sure either approach is viable in the long run though.

Post a Comment

Statistics

Locations of visitors to this page

blogspot visitor
Stat Counter

Total Pageviews

Ads

Books

Followers

Blog Archive

Labels

australia (603) global warming (379) solar power (361) peak oil (333) renewable energy (222) electric vehicles (209) wind power (180) ocean energy (159) csp (152) geothermal energy (143) smart grids (139) solar thermal power (139) tidal power (134) coal seam gas (129) nuclear power (124) oil (123) energy storage (121) solar pv (116) lng (114) geothermal power (112) china (111) iraq (111) green buildings (107) natural gas (106) agriculture (87) oil price (79) biofuel (77) smart meters (72) wave power (70) electricity grid (66) uk (65) energy efficiency (63) coal (57) google (57) internet (51) bicycle (49) shale gas (49) surveillance (49) food prices (48) big brother (47) thin film solar (42) canada (40) biomimicry (39) ocean power (37) politics (37) scotland (37) new zealand (35) shale oil (35) air transport (34) algae (34) water (34) queensland (32) california (31) concentrating solar power (31) credit crunch (31) saudi arabia (31) bioplastic (30) population (29) tesla (29) cogeneration (28) geoengineering (28) offshore wind power (28) arctic ice (26) drought (26) resource wars (26) woodside (26) batteries (25) bruce sterling (25) censorship (25) cleantech (25) ctl (23) economics (22) limits to growth (21) carbon tax (20) coal to liquids (20) distributed manufacturing (20) indonesia (20) iraq oil law (20) origin energy (20) brightsource (19) buckminster fuller (19) lithium (19) rail transport (19) ultracapacitor (19) santos (18) ausra (17) exxon (17) michael klare (17) cellulosic ethanol (16) collapse (16) electric bikes (16) mapping (16) ucg (16) atlantis (15) bees (15) concentrating solar thermal power (15) ethanol (15) geodynamics (15) iceland (15) psychology (15) brazil (14) fertiliser (14) lithium ion batteries (14) al gore (13) ambient energy (13) biodiesel (13) bucky fuller (13) carbon emissions (13) cities (13) investment (13) kenya (13) matthew simmons (13) public transport (13) biochar (12) chile (12) internet of things (12) otec (12) texas (12) victoria (12) cradle to cradle (11) desertec (11) energy policy (11) hybrid car (11) terra preta (11) amory lovins (10) fabber (10) gazprom (10) goldman sachs (10) gtl (10) severn estuary (10) tinfoil (10) toyota (10) volt (10) afghanistan (9) alaska (9) biomass (9) carbon trading (9) distributed generation (9) esolar (9) four day week (9) fuel cells (9) jeremy leggett (9) pge (9) sweden (9) antarctica (8) arrow energy (8) big oil (8) eroei (8) fish (8) floating offshore wind power (8) guerilla gardening (8) linc energy (8) methane (8) methane hydrates (8) nanosolar (8) natural gas pipelines (8) pentland firth (8) relocalisation (8) stirling engine (8) us elections (8) western australia (8) airborne wind turbines (7) bloom energy (7) boeing (7) bolivia (7) chp (7) climategate (7) copenhagen (7) saul griffith (7) vinod khosla (7) apocaphilia (6) ceramic fuel cells (6) cigs (6) futurism (6) jatropha (6) local currencies (6) nigeria (6) ocean acidification (6) scenario planning (6) somalia (6) t boone pickens (6) space based solar power (5) varanus island (5) garbage (4) global energy grid (4) kevin kelly (4) low temperature geothermal power (4) oled (4) tim flannery (4) v2g (4) club of rome (3) norman borlaug (2) peak oil portfolio (1)