APPEA: exploration efforts won't be enough to replace depleting reserves  

Posted by Big Gav in , ,

The last comment from Belinda Robinson of the APPEA in this article is interesting - she must be a closet peaker. From the ABC - Soaring petrol prices spark oil hunt Down Under.

The price of petrol has nudged past $1.70 in some Australia cities, prompting people to question whether there are any untapped oil reserves in our own backyard. And the president of the Geosciences Council, Dr Trevor Powell, has been singled out by the oil exploration industry to identify potential sites. "The areas that appear to have the greatest promise is the southern margin from Australia - extending from roughly Kangaroo Island, round the south-western tip of Western Australia," Dr Powell said.

"The reason why that area is thought to have prospectivity is because there are a series of sedimentary basins which have very thick sediments. They are of the right geological age and there are other characteristics, such as their structure, which may be correct to contain petroleum."

The Australian Petroleum Production and Exploration Association's chief executive, Belinda Robinson, says the best place to look is usually next to existing operations. "That's certainly where the risks and the costs are a lot lower, and that is where we traditionally go and explore," she said.

"But if we are interested in wanting to find another new oil province, then we would need to start looking in those areas that we call frontier areas, or those areas where we haven't explored before. They include places down around the Great Australian Bight in the south-west of Australia, right up north in the Arafura Sea, further in the north-west and in the far east. They're the sorts of areas that Geoscience Australia believes could hold the prospect of another oil and gas province."

The problem is, it won't be cheap to explore there. "Before you've even got the infrastructure challenges, there would also be challenges in actually getting there and exploring because the water is very deep," Ms Robinson said. "But thanks to developing technology, we are able to go into deeper and deeper water. But it is risky and it is costly."

The theory is higher oil prices encourage investment in exploration, but Ms Robinson says costs are also increasing, so exploration efforts won't be enough to replace depleting reserves.

0 comments

Post a Comment

Statistics

Locations of visitors to this page

blogspot visitor
Stat Counter

Total Pageviews

Ads

Books

Followers

Blog Archive

Labels

australia (619) global warming (423) solar power (397) peak oil (355) renewable energy (302) electric vehicles (250) wind power (194) ocean energy (165) csp (159) solar thermal power (145) geothermal energy (144) energy storage (142) smart grids (140) oil (139) solar pv (138) tidal power (137) coal seam gas (131) nuclear power (129) china (120) lng (117) iraq (113) geothermal power (112) green buildings (110) natural gas (110) agriculture (91) oil price (80) biofuel (78) wave power (73) smart meters (72) coal (70) uk (69) electricity grid (67) energy efficiency (64) google (58) internet (50) surveillance (50) bicycle (49) big brother (49) shale gas (49) food prices (48) tesla (46) thin film solar (42) biomimicry (40) canada (40) scotland (38) ocean power (37) politics (37) shale oil (37) new zealand (35) air transport (34) algae (34) water (34) arctic ice (33) concentrating solar power (33) saudi arabia (33) queensland (32) california (31) credit crunch (31) bioplastic (30) offshore wind power (30) population (30) cogeneration (28) geoengineering (28) batteries (26) drought (26) resource wars (26) woodside (26) censorship (25) cleantech (25) bruce sterling (24) ctl (23) limits to growth (23) carbon tax (22) economics (22) exxon (22) lithium (22) buckminster fuller (21) distributed manufacturing (21) iraq oil law (21) coal to liquids (20) indonesia (20) origin energy (20) brightsource (19) rail transport (19) ultracapacitor (19) santos (18) ausra (17) collapse (17) electric bikes (17) michael klare (17) atlantis (16) cellulosic ethanol (16) iceland (16) lithium ion batteries (16) mapping (16) ucg (16) bees (15) concentrating solar thermal power (15) ethanol (15) geodynamics (15) psychology (15) al gore (14) brazil (14) bucky fuller (14) carbon emissions (14) fertiliser (14) matthew simmons (14) ambient energy (13) biodiesel (13) investment (13) kenya (13) public transport (13) big oil (12) biochar (12) chile (12) cities (12) desertec (12) internet of things (12) otec (12) texas (12) victoria (12) antarctica (11) cradle to cradle (11) energy policy (11) hybrid car (11) terra preta (11) tinfoil (11) toyota (11) amory lovins (10) fabber (10) gazprom (10) goldman sachs (10) gtl (10) severn estuary (10) volt (10) afghanistan (9) alaska (9) biomass (9) carbon trading (9) distributed generation (9) esolar (9) four day week (9) fuel cells (9) jeremy leggett (9) methane hydrates (9) pge (9) sweden (9) arrow energy (8) bolivia (8) eroei (8) fish (8) floating offshore wind power (8) guerilla gardening (8) linc energy (8) methane (8) nanosolar (8) natural gas pipelines (8) pentland firth (8) saul griffith (8) stirling engine (8) us elections (8) western australia (8) airborne wind turbines (7) bloom energy (7) boeing (7) chp (7) climategate (7) copenhagen (7) scenario planning (7) vinod khosla (7) apocaphilia (6) ceramic fuel cells (6) cigs (6) futurism (6) jatropha (6) nigeria (6) ocean acidification (6) relocalisation (6) somalia (6) t boone pickens (6) local currencies (5) space based solar power (5) varanus island (5) garbage (4) global energy grid (4) kevin kelly (4) low temperature geothermal power (4) oled (4) tim flannery (4) v2g (4) club of rome (3) norman borlaug (2) peak oil portfolio (1)