More Compressed Air Energy Storage Projects Underway  

Posted by Big Gav in , ,

TreeHugger has a post on a New Jersey initiative to used compressed air energy storage (CAES) for wind power - New Jersey Utility Invests $20 Million Into Compressed Air Energy Storage. CNet's GreenTech blog has some more energy storage examples - Compressed-air storage coming to wind power.

While I’m not convinced that the issue of renewable energy’s intermittency is as great a problem as it is often made out to be—in the sense that it's not a valid argument against deploying as much renewable energy as we can, as is sometimes claimed—storage solutions for renewable energy sources do need to be developed. In New Jersey, utility PSEG is turning to an often overlooked technology to address the problem.

PSEG announced earlier this week that it would be investing $20 million over the next three years into developing underground compressed-air storage systems for wind turbines. Currently there are two Compressed Air Energy Storage (CAES) systems operating in the world, one in Alabama and the other in Huntorf, Germany.

The way it works is this: Air is pumped into underground storage chambers (depleted gas wells, salt caverns, or some other formation). There it can be stored until needed, holding enough air for up to several days worth of stored energy. When it is needed, the pressurized air is released from the chamber and used to drive a turbine to make electricity.

To develop PSEG’s compressed-air storage systems it has formed a joint venture, called Energy Storage and Power, with the designer of the Alabama CAES system, Michael Nakamkhin.

2 comments

Intermittency is only one reason for wind energy storage. And, as you suggest, perhaps not a major reason to create a lot of storage.

Time shifting is perhaps the larger reason.

Wind is now fairly inexpensive but a lot of wind electricity is produced at night when demand is low. Building storage means the ability to capture energy at night and use it during hot afternoons.

Stored wind electricity is considerably less expense than new nuclear would be.

Another reason to consider energy storage is to maximize utilization of transmission lines where transmission capacity/expansions are constrained. In addition, CAES could even enable wind to provide baseload power - see this report that I co-authored earlier this year

http://www.princeton.edu/~ssuccar/caesReport.html

Post a Comment

Ads

Ads

Statistics


referer referrer referers referrers http_referer

Locations of visitors to this page

Ads

Books

Followers

News

Loading...

Blog Archive

Labels

australia (499) global warming (290) solar power (261) peak oil (259) electric vehicles (168) wind power (140) smart grids (137) geothermal energy (131) csp (127) solar thermal power (115) ocean energy (112) coal seam gas (109) nuclear power (104) tidal power (103) oil (102) iraq (101) green buildings (98) china (97) geothermal power (97) renewable energy (88) lng (87) agriculture (79) smart meters (71) biofuel (69) solar pv (68) energy storage (67) natural gas (66) oil price (63) energy efficiency (56) uk (56) wave power (53) electricity grid (49) google (49) big brother (46) coal (45) food prices (45) internet (42) thin film solar (39) bicycle (37) ocean power (37) biomimicry (36) new zealand (34) air transport (33) algae (32) water (32) canada (31) credit crunch (31) politics (31) queensland (31) concentrating solar power (30) bioplastic (29) scotland (29) population (27) resource wars (26) surveillance (26) batteries (25) california (25) censorship (25) cleantech (25) geoengineering (25) shale gas (25) cogeneration (24) saudi arabia (24) ctl (23) offshore wind power (23) bruce sterling (22) economics (22) woodside (22) coal to liquids (20) iraq oil law (20) drought (19) origin energy (19) ultracapacitor (19) brightsource (18) indonesia (18) ausra (17) rail transport (17) santos (17) arctic ice (16) carbon tax (16) lithium (16) ucg (16) buckminster fuller (15) collapse (15) psychology (15) concentrating solar thermal power (14) exxon (14) geodynamics (14) iceland (14) mapping (14) michael klare (14) biodiesel (13) carbon emissions (13) cellulosic ethanol (13) fertiliser (13) investment (13) limits to growth (13) tesla (13) ambient energy (12) atlantis (12) cities (12) electric bikes (12) ethanol (12) kenya (12) matthew simmons (12) public transport (12) victoria (12) al gore (11) biochar (11) brazil (11) energy policy (11) texas (11) desertec (10) goldman sachs (10) hybrid car (10) internet of things (10) shale oil (10) terra preta (10) tinfoil (10) volt (10) alaska (9) bees (9) biomass (9) carbon trading (9) cradle to cradle (9) gazprom (9) gtl (9) pge (9) sweden (9) toyota (9) afghanistan (8) amory lovins (8) big oil (8) bucky fuller (8) chile (8) distributed manufacturing (8) eroei (8) esolar (8) fabber (8) fuel cells (8) linc energy (8) lithium ion batteries (8) methane hydrates (8) relocalisation (8) us elections (8) western australia (8) antarctica (7) arrow energy (7) bloom energy (7) boeing (7) climategate (7) copenhagen (7) distributed generation (7) fish (7) floating offshore wind power (7) guerilla gardening (7) methane (7) nanosolar (7) otec (7) severn estuary (7) vinod khosla (7) apocaphilia (6) bolivia (6) ceramic fuel cells (6) cigs (6) four day week (6) jatropha (6) jeremy leggett (6) local currencies (6) natural gas pipelines (6) nigeria (6) pentland firth (6) somalia (6) stirling engine (6) t boone pickens (6) chp (5) futurism (5) ocean acidification (5) saul griffith (5) varanus island (5) airborne wind turbines (4) garbage (4) kevin kelly (4) low temperature geothermal power (4) oled (4) scenario planning (4) space based solar power (4) tim flannery (4) v2g (4) club of rome (3) global energy grid (2) norman borlaug (2) peak oil portfolio (1)