Future Still Bright For Coal Seam Gas ?  

Posted by Big Gav in

The Australian has a column predicting a bright future for coal seam gas producers, in spite of tumpling oil prices - Coal seam gas will survive falling energy prices.

Gladstone's coal seam gas-to-LNG hopefuls are in a decent position to weather this financial storm. While the inter-related credit freeze and falling oil and gas prices have severely dented investor sentiment, and there is no questions projects could be delayed, the main local players remain cashed up from stake sales.

Analysts also say oil prices that are hovering around $US70 a barrel still have a long way to fall before the LNG export schemes start looking uneconomic. "I do not see the fall in energy prices as being too much of a negative for coal seam methane," ABN AMRO analyst Chris Brown said. "The oil price would have to be well south of $US50 a barrel for the projects to be uneconomic."

The projects are also based on long-term average oil prices and with production not expected for four to five years, a short dip below $US50 would not derail them.

The financial world is a vastly different place to what it was just six weeks ago, when Origin Energy auctioned off a stake in its huge Queensland CSG reserves to ConocoPhillips for up to $9.6billion, marking the peak in a series of transactions with global players that, at that stage, had markedly revalued higher its reserves.

But since early September, when the Origin deal was announced, most of the four local companies have suffered share price falls more than double the 19 per cent fall in the All Ordinaries Index over the same period, as investors cashed in shares and fretted about the state of energy prices and unbuilt projects.

Santos, which is planning an 8million tonnes a year LNG plant with Malaysia's Petronas, has slumped 48 per cent. Queensland Gas, which has aligned with BG Group for a project about the same size, is down 41 per cent. And Arrow Energy, which sold 30percent of its reserves to Shell and is looking at a much smaller plant, has lost 38 per cent.

But Origin, which is planning a mammoth four-train, 14 million tonnes a year operation with Conoco that would rival the size of the North West Shelf LNG operation, has held strong and is down just 13 per cent at $15.37.

This is not far below the $15.50 a share that BG offered for Origin before Santos's $US2.5 billion sale of a share in its CSG assets to Petronas resulted in Origin managing director Grant King walking away and trying to get more for his reserves.

Morgan Stanley energy analyst Stuart Baker said the global malaise and lack of access to cash was bound to slow development, but that the CSG-to-LNG sector probably would not be derailed.

"In general, the coal seam gas industry has a couple of attractive aspects that are beneficial," he said. "They have world-class reserves and large companies that are putting in a lot of investment. "If oil goes to $US30, then not much is viable, but you would hope their investment would be on a more conservative view of the world than those in markets (that pushed oil up to almost $US150 a barrel earlier this year)."

Mr Baker also said that LNG demand was based on electricity use and therefore not as sensitive as that for petrol when global growth slowed.

In February, QGC said that with oil at $US60 a barrel, its share of the BG project would bring in revenue of $25 billion over the life of the project and $800 million in earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation.

None of the players would reveal long-term oil prices at which they thought their plants would become uneconomic, or what price their studies were based on.

Santos pointed out oil prices were at about the same level as they are now when it announced its $8 billion project in July last year. "The fundamentals for energy demand remain on track," a spokesman said. "Our bet on Asian energy demand is well founded and the economics of our project depend not only on revenue but on costs."

Costs of major resources projects, which have been subject to huge inflation in recent years, are expected to pull back with sliding commodities prices.

Despite confidence projects would proceed, ABN AMRO's Mr Brown said falling share prices and a sliding dollar might make consolidation in the sector cheaper for predators.

0 comments

Post a Comment

Statistics

Locations of visitors to this page

blogspot visitor
Stat Counter

Total Pageviews

Ads

Books

Followers

Blog Archive

Labels

australia (619) global warming (423) solar power (397) peak oil (355) renewable energy (302) electric vehicles (250) wind power (194) ocean energy (165) csp (159) solar thermal power (145) geothermal energy (144) energy storage (142) smart grids (140) oil (139) solar pv (138) tidal power (137) coal seam gas (131) nuclear power (129) china (120) lng (117) iraq (113) geothermal power (112) green buildings (110) natural gas (110) agriculture (91) oil price (80) biofuel (78) wave power (73) smart meters (72) coal (70) uk (69) electricity grid (67) energy efficiency (64) google (58) internet (50) surveillance (50) bicycle (49) big brother (49) shale gas (49) food prices (48) tesla (46) thin film solar (42) biomimicry (40) canada (40) scotland (38) ocean power (37) politics (37) shale oil (37) new zealand (35) air transport (34) algae (34) water (34) arctic ice (33) concentrating solar power (33) saudi arabia (33) queensland (32) california (31) credit crunch (31) bioplastic (30) offshore wind power (30) population (30) cogeneration (28) geoengineering (28) batteries (26) drought (26) resource wars (26) woodside (26) censorship (25) cleantech (25) bruce sterling (24) ctl (23) limits to growth (23) carbon tax (22) economics (22) exxon (22) lithium (22) buckminster fuller (21) distributed manufacturing (21) iraq oil law (21) coal to liquids (20) indonesia (20) origin energy (20) brightsource (19) rail transport (19) ultracapacitor (19) santos (18) ausra (17) collapse (17) electric bikes (17) michael klare (17) atlantis (16) cellulosic ethanol (16) iceland (16) lithium ion batteries (16) mapping (16) ucg (16) bees (15) concentrating solar thermal power (15) ethanol (15) geodynamics (15) psychology (15) al gore (14) brazil (14) bucky fuller (14) carbon emissions (14) fertiliser (14) matthew simmons (14) ambient energy (13) biodiesel (13) investment (13) kenya (13) public transport (13) big oil (12) biochar (12) chile (12) cities (12) desertec (12) internet of things (12) otec (12) texas (12) victoria (12) antarctica (11) cradle to cradle (11) energy policy (11) hybrid car (11) terra preta (11) tinfoil (11) toyota (11) amory lovins (10) fabber (10) gazprom (10) goldman sachs (10) gtl (10) severn estuary (10) volt (10) afghanistan (9) alaska (9) biomass (9) carbon trading (9) distributed generation (9) esolar (9) four day week (9) fuel cells (9) jeremy leggett (9) methane hydrates (9) pge (9) sweden (9) arrow energy (8) bolivia (8) eroei (8) fish (8) floating offshore wind power (8) guerilla gardening (8) linc energy (8) methane (8) nanosolar (8) natural gas pipelines (8) pentland firth (8) saul griffith (8) stirling engine (8) us elections (8) western australia (8) airborne wind turbines (7) bloom energy (7) boeing (7) chp (7) climategate (7) copenhagen (7) scenario planning (7) vinod khosla (7) apocaphilia (6) ceramic fuel cells (6) cigs (6) futurism (6) jatropha (6) nigeria (6) ocean acidification (6) relocalisation (6) somalia (6) t boone pickens (6) local currencies (5) space based solar power (5) varanus island (5) garbage (4) global energy grid (4) kevin kelly (4) low temperature geothermal power (4) oled (4) tim flannery (4) v2g (4) club of rome (3) norman borlaug (2) peak oil portfolio (1)