The Triumph of CSM over UCG: Linc Flees To South Australia  

Posted by Big Gav in , , , , ,

The Courier Mail reports that Queensland's coal seam gas producers have succeeded in chasing underground coal gasification hopeful Linc Energy out of the state, with Linc deciding its coal to liquids technology might find the going easier in South Australia - Linc pulls out of Queensland $1b liquids plan, heads to SA. More at Bloomberg.

UNDERGROUND coal gasification hopeful Linc Energy has seen the writing on the wall in Queensland and will transfer plans for its $1 billion gas-to-liquids plant to South Australia.

For many years Linc has been planning a large UCG-GTL plant at Chinchilla in Queensland, where it has spent close to $50 million on a pilot liquids plant and a coal exploration program.

It was hoping to begin detailed designs next year on a commercial facility, eventually producing 20,000 barrels of diesel and aviation fuel a day just down the road from the pilot plant.

But Linc, which recently took over Adelaide-based energy hopeful Sapex to get access to its large coal exploration areas in SA's Arckaringa Basin, yesterday announced that instead it would "focus on developing its first commercial UCG-GTL operation in South Australia".

The announcement came a day after BG Group, which has just taken over coal seam gas group Queensland Gas Company, called on the Queensland Government to give coal seam gas companies, rather than UCG groups, priority over coal exploration areas in Queensland.

At present, coal exploration licences (used by UCG groups) and petroleum licences (which govern CSG development) can exist over the same resource.

BG chief executive Frank Chapman said his group's plans to spend as much as $15 billion on CSG development and LNG processing at Gladstone -- where Santos, Origin Energy and Arrow Energy and their international partners are also planning large multibillion-dollar LNG developments -- would have to be delayed unless BG could get guaranteed resource security.

Linc, QGC and Arrow Energy, have competing petroleum interests over part of the coal areas Linc holds near Chinchilla.

There was no news from the Queensland Government yesterday on BG's demands. A spokeswoman for Mines and Energy Minister Geoff Wilson said there had been no formal or informal contact recently with Linc about its UCG plans.

But CSG groups have lobbied the Government hard, raising questions about UCG's commercial credentials and its safety, particularly as it relates to potential water table pollution, with rural interests also chipping in on the latter question.

And in an August statement the department had no intention of granting production tenures for underground coal gasification for at least three years.



Meanwhile the SMH has an update on the CSG boom, predicting rising gas prices for the NSW market - It's boom time for Queensland coal-seam gas.
THE boom in eastern Australia's coal-seam gas industry will accelerate a rise in NSW gas prices, the national energy regulator says.

The State of the Energy Market 2008 report, to be published today, says the rush of projects to develop Queensland's coal-seam gas into an exportable liquidate form has already nudged up prices along the east coast, as producers seek higher returns.

A gigajoule of gas fetched $2.50-$2.90 two years ago but the report's lead essay by forecasters ACIL Tasman said recent sales in Queensland had peaked at $7.

Unlike electricity, gas markets outside of Victoria's are opaque and allow deals to be settled privately, leaving forecasts hazy. But the report said gas was regularly selling for above $4 a gigajoule, as producers seek "significantly higher prices".

Global oil powers have been attracted to converting Queensland's extensive reserves into liquefied natural gas (LNG), which can fetch much higher prices on global markets. No LNG plants have been suggested for NSW but prices are being forced up regardless.

Oil has fallen more than 60 per cent from its peak but the companies behind the multibillion-dollar LNG projects are confident of getting high prices despite the downturn.

"The fact that most of the major [coal-seam gas] producers are currently looking to boost reserves and production capacity to underpin proposed LNG facilities means that the supply surplus which had prevailed in the Queensland market for several years has now been reversed," it said.

Historically, Australians have had the world's cheapest gas. In the US, it costs about $US6.70 per million British thermal units, slightly less than a gigajoule. ...

Gas companies have long argued that prices are set to rise towards "export parity'. The report confirms the Queensland LNG plans are accelerating the process. Australia is the fifth largest LNG exporter. The coal-seam gas bonanza has seen the likes of ConocoPhillips in the US, Britain's BG Group and Malaysia's Petronas pay well above previous prices.

7 comments

Anonymous   says 8:31 AM

They grow watermelons at Chinchilla but Arckaringa Basin is mostly desert between Coober Pedy and Olympic Dam. I'd say UCG to make liquid fuel is finished worldwide if Linc are at the front of efforts. Perhaps they can make a gas suitable to pipe to other mines in the area.

Yeah - I've never understood where the water will come from for this project, when other companies have proposed it.

Is the great artesian basin near enough - maybe they think there is aquifer water available...

Anonymous   says 12:33 PM

There's water in the coal seam. Still, I agree that UCG is finished in Qld for the time being. No doubt the state government decided it wanted a CSG export opportunity rather than cheaper electricity. The great unwashed of Qld will pay the price when the rise of gas prices to export parity means they pay more for power, but problems for the vote fodder doesn't worry the pollies.

Anonymous   says 9:21 PM

I think whatever you provide about underground coal gasification that could helpful to our environment.

I'm not sure there is anything environmentally friendly about UCG (see my post on coal to liquids in Australia).

The best you could say about it is that it is less harmful than mining and burning the coal.

John   says 9:43 AM

I have to agree that the Qld gov has decided to screw the vote fodder, and no doubt take a little bit more on the side, as CSM prices rise towards world parity. 'Captain' Bligh is already softening us up by saying she's not going to let the CSM producers raise the price to 'full' parity. I can understand the worry of the CSM producers. UCG is much cheaper than CSM, and, if it was available, the power generators would flee to it as CSG prices rose, whacking CSM's Qld market on the head.

Neil   says 9:52 PM

Ok NY HQ of big Oil will go ucg it's just a matter of time but leave it to linc to drag it's feet to prove a large plant can make 20000 bpd just get on with it already or is linc milking the system like the csg cadre.

Post a Comment

Statistics

Locations of visitors to this page

blogspot visitor
Stat Counter

Total Pageviews

Ads

Books

Followers

Blog Archive

Labels

australia (619) global warming (423) solar power (397) peak oil (355) renewable energy (302) electric vehicles (250) wind power (194) ocean energy (165) csp (159) solar thermal power (145) geothermal energy (144) energy storage (142) smart grids (140) oil (139) solar pv (138) tidal power (137) coal seam gas (131) nuclear power (129) china (120) lng (117) iraq (113) geothermal power (112) green buildings (110) natural gas (110) agriculture (91) oil price (80) biofuel (78) wave power (73) smart meters (72) coal (70) uk (69) electricity grid (67) energy efficiency (64) google (58) internet (50) surveillance (50) bicycle (49) big brother (49) shale gas (49) food prices (48) tesla (46) thin film solar (42) biomimicry (40) canada (40) scotland (38) ocean power (37) politics (37) shale oil (37) new zealand (35) air transport (34) algae (34) water (34) arctic ice (33) concentrating solar power (33) saudi arabia (33) queensland (32) california (31) credit crunch (31) bioplastic (30) offshore wind power (30) population (30) cogeneration (28) geoengineering (28) batteries (26) drought (26) resource wars (26) woodside (26) censorship (25) cleantech (25) bruce sterling (24) ctl (23) limits to growth (23) carbon tax (22) economics (22) exxon (22) lithium (22) buckminster fuller (21) distributed manufacturing (21) iraq oil law (21) coal to liquids (20) indonesia (20) origin energy (20) brightsource (19) rail transport (19) ultracapacitor (19) santos (18) ausra (17) collapse (17) electric bikes (17) michael klare (17) atlantis (16) cellulosic ethanol (16) iceland (16) lithium ion batteries (16) mapping (16) ucg (16) bees (15) concentrating solar thermal power (15) ethanol (15) geodynamics (15) psychology (15) al gore (14) brazil (14) bucky fuller (14) carbon emissions (14) fertiliser (14) matthew simmons (14) ambient energy (13) biodiesel (13) investment (13) kenya (13) public transport (13) big oil (12) biochar (12) chile (12) cities (12) desertec (12) internet of things (12) otec (12) texas (12) victoria (12) antarctica (11) cradle to cradle (11) energy policy (11) hybrid car (11) terra preta (11) tinfoil (11) toyota (11) amory lovins (10) fabber (10) gazprom (10) goldman sachs (10) gtl (10) severn estuary (10) volt (10) afghanistan (9) alaska (9) biomass (9) carbon trading (9) distributed generation (9) esolar (9) four day week (9) fuel cells (9) jeremy leggett (9) methane hydrates (9) pge (9) sweden (9) arrow energy (8) bolivia (8) eroei (8) fish (8) floating offshore wind power (8) guerilla gardening (8) linc energy (8) methane (8) nanosolar (8) natural gas pipelines (8) pentland firth (8) saul griffith (8) stirling engine (8) us elections (8) western australia (8) airborne wind turbines (7) bloom energy (7) boeing (7) chp (7) climategate (7) copenhagen (7) scenario planning (7) vinod khosla (7) apocaphilia (6) ceramic fuel cells (6) cigs (6) futurism (6) jatropha (6) nigeria (6) ocean acidification (6) relocalisation (6) somalia (6) t boone pickens (6) local currencies (5) space based solar power (5) varanus island (5) garbage (4) global energy grid (4) kevin kelly (4) low temperature geothermal power (4) oled (4) tim flannery (4) v2g (4) club of rome (3) norman borlaug (2) peak oil portfolio (1)