Can GM's Volt Save the Company?  

Posted by Big Gav in ,

The future for GM is looking pretty bleak, but that isn't stopping Technology Review wondering if the company can be revived with a successful debut of its hybrid car - Can GM's Volt Save the Company?.

In the wake of harsh criticism from President Obama and his administration last week, GM is building a case that it's taking the steps needed to make its planned plug-in hybrid, the Chevrolet Volt, a commercial success.

Last week, President Obama said that GM had failed to present a convincing plan to turn around its decline, and he warned that the automaker may face bankruptcy. Part of the problem, according to a report by his administration, is that the company is not producing the right mix of vehicles to compete with other automakers. For example, the Volt, the company's attempt to overcome Toyota's lead in green vehicle technology, "is currently projected to be much more expensive than its gasoline-fueled peers and will likely need substantial reductions in manufacturing cost in order to become commercially viable," the report said.

But the Volt is central to GM's plans for the "reinvention of our company," said Tony Posawatz, the vehicle line manager for the Volt, in a conference call with reporters last week. The car can be recharged by plugging it in, and will allow people to drive 40 miles without using any gasoline. For longer trips, an onboard generator that runs on gasoline or ethanol will recharge the battery to extend the car's range. GM plans to use the basic platform for the Volt in a range of vehicles. Indeed, it has already announced two derivatives of the car, one a Cadillac and the other a plug-in hybrid for Europe.

Posawatz acknowledged that the first-generation version of the Volt, due out at the end of 2010, will be more expensive "than one would want." But he said that the company is already developing the second generation of the car, which could be thousands of dollars less expensive. The company has also been working with local governments and utilities to help it sell more cars by creating various incentives.

One way to save money is by improving the battery system. For the first version of the Volt, GM has taken extra pains to make sure that the battery will last, Posawatz said. A dedicated heating and cooling system will prevent the temperature extremes that can quickly degrade a battery. In addition, because discharging the battery completely can also shorten its life, control systems keep the battery from being discharged more than about 50 percent. But these measures could be overkill, Posawatz noted. "We have put in place a lot of extra fail-safe engineering solutions," he said. "So there are some opportunities [to reduce costs] as we refine the design."

Indeed, tests on similar batteries by the Electric Power Research Institute have shown that they can last for more than 10 years even if discharged over 75 percent. Using more of the energy in the batteries would reduce the number of cells needed. Posawatz said that the dedicated heating and cooling system might also be unnecessary.

3 comments

no.

GM needs to offer two versions of the Volt. One version would be the expensive 64 kilometer battery range Volt designed for sale to the upper income brackets and a 32 kilometer battery range Volt for the average Jane and Joe. Reducing the battery size and range in half could cut more than 15,000 dollars off the price.

Since cities are already starting to add electric recharging stations to city streets, the ability to recharge your battery after reaching your destination could double the range of the 32 kilometer ranged Volt battery.

GM also needs to offer some pure EV models for the eco-conscious wealthy with at least the 260 kilometer range that the EV1 had.

http://newpapyrusmagazine.blogspot.com/2008/09/plug-in-hybrid-revolution.html

I am not a pessimist, but I have a hard time with this one guys...

I have drove, worked and helped on some amazing vehicles over the last 20 years.
200 mpg fuel sippers, 7 passenger clean 2 cycle CNG's, a garage full of long range electric...

I see innovation coming and it is not from volt.
The volts looks just like it the cars it copies
(see photos here)


Is innovation taking other ideas and selling them under different brands?

My 93' GEO (Chevy/Toyota car) gets between 38-44mpg all the time, regardless of how I treat it. (WI -10'F = bad MPG in winter).

Before that, I drove a 85 Renault alliance that averaged over 50mpg, but sacrificed mpg for the safety and reliability of the GEO due to having a couple kids (they do that to you).

I waited the last decade with dreams, there would be another Chevy that would replace my GEO.

Or just a GEO with a VW 1.2L turbo clean diesel engine running CNG/BIOgas...
like
Top Gear's $7,000 70mpg VW?


And yes, it is healthy to dream, but when people force their dreams into reality it is called a delusion...

The VOLT is the last shred of hope...
Nissan has a 'ready for primetime full long range electric' - I think will rock the world in 2011.

VW and BMW have a glutton of 45mpg safe + family cars on the table...


Even in my budget... there are now full electric and hybrid cars coming to
WalMart between $1,000-$5,000



But, a VOLT $40,000+ 'copy car' that shows less innovation than the 1905 Pieper.
(In my lifetime, I have not spent a total of $40,000 on ALL my daily driven cars...)


Did G.M. watch the Top Gear 70mpg VW or hear about GS and Nissan Motors?


We also have to equate lifetime environmental and 'true ownership costs...
The 'Dust to Dust' cost to operate a Prius is still $2.191 per mile.

What will the VOLT be?
At least $4 per mile... at $40K


‘Earth to G.M., Time to get in the game!’

Your recent bailout cash could have bought the companies that make better technology and secured a stable future in the global auto market for decades while saving it at the same time !


Seriously, I have purchased great Chevy's in the past, but I am keeping the GEO or buying Foreign until I see affordable, clean innovation in U.S. show rooms.


NOTE:
And NO these Tesla and other 'ultra complex' hybrids offer minimal E-ROI than the SUV's they slam...

P.S. just me chiming in on this, shows that sometimes even I sweat the smalls stuff ;-)

Post a Comment

Statistics

Locations of visitors to this page

blogspot visitor
Stat Counter

Total Pageviews

Ads

Books

Followers

Blog Archive

Labels

australia (619) global warming (423) solar power (397) peak oil (355) renewable energy (302) electric vehicles (250) wind power (194) ocean energy (165) csp (159) solar thermal power (145) geothermal energy (144) energy storage (142) smart grids (140) oil (139) solar pv (138) tidal power (137) coal seam gas (131) nuclear power (129) china (120) lng (117) iraq (113) geothermal power (112) green buildings (110) natural gas (110) agriculture (91) oil price (80) biofuel (78) wave power (73) smart meters (72) coal (70) uk (69) electricity grid (67) energy efficiency (64) google (58) internet (50) surveillance (50) bicycle (49) big brother (49) shale gas (49) food prices (48) tesla (46) thin film solar (42) biomimicry (40) canada (40) scotland (38) ocean power (37) politics (37) shale oil (37) new zealand (35) air transport (34) algae (34) water (34) arctic ice (33) concentrating solar power (33) saudi arabia (33) queensland (32) california (31) credit crunch (31) bioplastic (30) offshore wind power (30) population (30) cogeneration (28) geoengineering (28) batteries (26) drought (26) resource wars (26) woodside (26) censorship (25) cleantech (25) bruce sterling (24) ctl (23) limits to growth (23) carbon tax (22) economics (22) exxon (22) lithium (22) buckminster fuller (21) distributed manufacturing (21) iraq oil law (21) coal to liquids (20) indonesia (20) origin energy (20) brightsource (19) rail transport (19) ultracapacitor (19) santos (18) ausra (17) collapse (17) electric bikes (17) michael klare (17) atlantis (16) cellulosic ethanol (16) iceland (16) lithium ion batteries (16) mapping (16) ucg (16) bees (15) concentrating solar thermal power (15) ethanol (15) geodynamics (15) psychology (15) al gore (14) brazil (14) bucky fuller (14) carbon emissions (14) fertiliser (14) matthew simmons (14) ambient energy (13) biodiesel (13) investment (13) kenya (13) public transport (13) big oil (12) biochar (12) chile (12) cities (12) desertec (12) internet of things (12) otec (12) texas (12) victoria (12) antarctica (11) cradle to cradle (11) energy policy (11) hybrid car (11) terra preta (11) tinfoil (11) toyota (11) amory lovins (10) fabber (10) gazprom (10) goldman sachs (10) gtl (10) severn estuary (10) volt (10) afghanistan (9) alaska (9) biomass (9) carbon trading (9) distributed generation (9) esolar (9) four day week (9) fuel cells (9) jeremy leggett (9) methane hydrates (9) pge (9) sweden (9) arrow energy (8) bolivia (8) eroei (8) fish (8) floating offshore wind power (8) guerilla gardening (8) linc energy (8) methane (8) nanosolar (8) natural gas pipelines (8) pentland firth (8) saul griffith (8) stirling engine (8) us elections (8) western australia (8) airborne wind turbines (7) bloom energy (7) boeing (7) chp (7) climategate (7) copenhagen (7) scenario planning (7) vinod khosla (7) apocaphilia (6) ceramic fuel cells (6) cigs (6) futurism (6) jatropha (6) nigeria (6) ocean acidification (6) relocalisation (6) somalia (6) t boone pickens (6) local currencies (5) space based solar power (5) varanus island (5) garbage (4) global energy grid (4) kevin kelly (4) low temperature geothermal power (4) oled (4) tim flannery (4) v2g (4) club of rome (3) norman borlaug (2) peak oil portfolio (1)