Cisco chases billion-dollar smart grid dreams  

Posted by Big Gav in , ,

Smart grids continue to be the main area of focus for cleantech lately - Cleantech.com has a report on Cisco's entry into the market - Cisco chases billion-dollar smart grid dreams.

San Jose, Calif.-based Cisco Systems (Nasdaq: CSCO) today announced what some in the industry might have already suspected: The company is seeking to sell its intelligent networking infrastructure into the smart grid.

The directive was secretly announced as an internal company priority for 2009, and again in recent weeks as the company made plans for 2010, said Inbar Lasser-Raab, senior director of network systems at Cisco, in an interview with the Cleantech Group.

But today’s public launch of a cleantech strategy aims to repackage and combine Cisco’s existing technologies to create an intelligent IT infrastructure embedded with sensors and security to serve the forthcoming wave of smart grid adoption around the globe.

The U.S. electric grid loses roughly 7 percent of energy production through faulty transmission lines, theft and mechanical problems. Government investment in the sector has typically not aimed to solve those problems, Lasser-Raab said.

“The grid has only changed to support increased demand; it hasn’t changed structurally,” Lasser-Raab said. “It’s a major industry effort in the initial planning stages.”

The industry has lobbied for the creation of standards for electric grids that would distribute and track energy flow using an Internet-based system capable of supporting a variety of applications developed by private companies (see IBM rides third wave of cleantech).

Cisco estimates the field at approximately $20 billion annually over the next five years, $1 billion of which Cisco thinks it can harness.

Cisco envisions its role as designing the intelligent network infrastructure, as well as bringing in other vendors to plug in components to report and analyze data from the grid. That includes working with systems integrators and companies that sell solutions such as smart meters.

Reuters has a related report on the Obama administration calling an expanded, smarter grid an "urgent national priority" - Federal Smart Grid Initiatives a Big Boost for IT.
Progress towards building a smart power grid took a leap forward this week with the release of grid interoperability standards and increases to grant awards to achieve this "urgent national priority."

As support from the Obama administration continues alongside growing demands for enhanced energy stability and reduced emissions, companies like Cisco are rushing to develop smart grid communications technology.

Commerce Secretary Gary Locke and Energy Secretary Steven Chu announced the 16 smart grid standards after serving as chairmen at an energy industry meeting, a gathering that was intended to foster standards adoption by key players. Together they emphasized the urgency of advancing the electric power grid, and echoed the industry need for open source that have been previously voiced by groups like the ZigBee Alliance.

"We took a significant step toward developing the open and transparent interoperability standards necessary to realize the Smart Grid vision," said Secretary Locke. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), which has been working on smart grid standards since 2007 under the Energy Independence and Security Act, recognized the initial 16 standards, which will allow for compatibility between numerous competing technologies.

The two Secretaries announced that the Department if Energy would be increasing the smart grid program awards under the Recovery Act, raising the maximum Smart Grid Investment Grant Program award from $20 to $200 million and Smart Grid Demonstration Project awards from $40 to $100 million. In addition, $10 million in stimulus funds will be provided to the National Institute of Standards and Technology to support standards development.

1 comments

However stupid the idea of a 'smart grid' will prove to be... It is an
inarguable cash cow like corn ethanol to the commodities market, special
interest groups and lobbyists.

GE, CISCO and others will get in soon to make good on all available subsidizes.

Like the idea of 'cap-n-trade' markets... investors feel they need these cash
cow's to get the market 'back on track' ignoring the fact that these reactive,
short sighted investments are what killed the market (just insert
climatesolution with housingmarket in post 07 articles).

These are investor bubbles, not tangible investments or solutions.


Lets put asied that obivous point that these offer NO salvation for peak or
sustainable problems and focus on the $GREEN$.


My fear...
Much like nuclear in the 70's billions will be invested and when it is done tax
payers will be left with an outdated, incompatible, high maintenance
infrastructure no one can afford to maintain.

While GEOthermal, bio/seam gas are only small examples... they are 'plug and
play' into existing grid tech that can be done NOW while we build up the
supporting grid improvements around them - 'pay as you improve and not the other
way around'.

The idea of these billion dollar investments in a 'smart grid' when we have not
decided what will be plugged in (and will not for some time) appears to be
modeled after CA building their hydrogen highway and infrastructure with no cars
ready to drive on it...

By the time the cars are ready (2025) the complete highway and infrastructure
will be eroded and need to be completely reupdated around the future of 2025
tech.

While most experts see this obvious problem, CEO's and special interests see
only one thing - $GREEN$

During these pretty powerpoint and video presentations regarding 'smart grid
investments'... I ask how it is not better for the safety, security and
sustainability to 'Decentralize Energy' into small, segregated, community based
and maintained power systems that pay back to their 'tax paying' investors...

(This is a killjoy to subsidized big money players...)

The ONLY smart grid is a
Decentralized Energy Grid...

While I am not and do not support 'activist or reactivist'... Greenpeace does do
a good job on this video I have used in presentations.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=klooRS-Jjyo


I will have to be O.K. with them taking the $$$(because either way they will).
However, can we not sell 'stocks' in Community Based Decentralized Sustainable
Energy.

Then they get their money and we get 'some' results.

Three decades of this, how do we not see it coming again.

Repeating historic problems become epic.

Post a Comment

Statistics

Locations of visitors to this page

blogspot visitor
Stat Counter

Total Pageviews

Ads

Books

Followers

Blog Archive

Labels

australia (619) global warming (423) solar power (397) peak oil (355) renewable energy (302) electric vehicles (250) wind power (194) ocean energy (165) csp (159) solar thermal power (145) geothermal energy (144) energy storage (142) smart grids (140) oil (139) solar pv (138) tidal power (137) coal seam gas (131) nuclear power (129) china (120) lng (117) iraq (113) geothermal power (112) green buildings (110) natural gas (110) agriculture (91) oil price (80) biofuel (78) wave power (73) smart meters (72) coal (70) uk (69) electricity grid (67) energy efficiency (64) google (58) internet (50) surveillance (50) bicycle (49) big brother (49) shale gas (49) food prices (48) tesla (46) thin film solar (42) biomimicry (40) canada (40) scotland (38) ocean power (37) politics (37) shale oil (37) new zealand (35) air transport (34) algae (34) water (34) arctic ice (33) concentrating solar power (33) saudi arabia (33) queensland (32) california (31) credit crunch (31) bioplastic (30) offshore wind power (30) population (30) cogeneration (28) geoengineering (28) batteries (26) drought (26) resource wars (26) woodside (26) censorship (25) cleantech (25) bruce sterling (24) ctl (23) limits to growth (23) carbon tax (22) economics (22) exxon (22) lithium (22) buckminster fuller (21) distributed manufacturing (21) iraq oil law (21) coal to liquids (20) indonesia (20) origin energy (20) brightsource (19) rail transport (19) ultracapacitor (19) santos (18) ausra (17) collapse (17) electric bikes (17) michael klare (17) atlantis (16) cellulosic ethanol (16) iceland (16) lithium ion batteries (16) mapping (16) ucg (16) bees (15) concentrating solar thermal power (15) ethanol (15) geodynamics (15) psychology (15) al gore (14) brazil (14) bucky fuller (14) carbon emissions (14) fertiliser (14) matthew simmons (14) ambient energy (13) biodiesel (13) investment (13) kenya (13) public transport (13) big oil (12) biochar (12) chile (12) cities (12) desertec (12) internet of things (12) otec (12) texas (12) victoria (12) antarctica (11) cradle to cradle (11) energy policy (11) hybrid car (11) terra preta (11) tinfoil (11) toyota (11) amory lovins (10) fabber (10) gazprom (10) goldman sachs (10) gtl (10) severn estuary (10) volt (10) afghanistan (9) alaska (9) biomass (9) carbon trading (9) distributed generation (9) esolar (9) four day week (9) fuel cells (9) jeremy leggett (9) methane hydrates (9) pge (9) sweden (9) arrow energy (8) bolivia (8) eroei (8) fish (8) floating offshore wind power (8) guerilla gardening (8) linc energy (8) methane (8) nanosolar (8) natural gas pipelines (8) pentland firth (8) saul griffith (8) stirling engine (8) us elections (8) western australia (8) airborne wind turbines (7) bloom energy (7) boeing (7) chp (7) climategate (7) copenhagen (7) scenario planning (7) vinod khosla (7) apocaphilia (6) ceramic fuel cells (6) cigs (6) futurism (6) jatropha (6) nigeria (6) ocean acidification (6) relocalisation (6) somalia (6) t boone pickens (6) local currencies (5) space based solar power (5) varanus island (5) garbage (4) global energy grid (4) kevin kelly (4) low temperature geothermal power (4) oled (4) tim flannery (4) v2g (4) club of rome (3) norman borlaug (2) peak oil portfolio (1)