Green Metropolis: Urban Is Good
Posted by Big Gav in book review, cities, green metropolis
The New York Times has a review of a book called "Green Metropolis" ("Why Living Smaller, Living Closer, and Driving Less are the Keys toSustainability") in the "cities are the future" genre - Urban Is Good.
Owen, a staff writer for The New Yorker, makes a convincing case that Manhattan, Hong Kong and large, old European cities are inherently greener than less densely populated places because a higher percentage of their inhabitants walk, bike and use mass transit than drive; they share infrastructure and civic services more efficiently; they live in smaller spaces and use less energy to heat their homes (because those homes tend to share walls); and they’re less likely to accumulate a lot of large, energy-sucking appliances. People in cities use about half as much electricity as people who don’t, Owen reports, and the average New Yorker generates fewer greenhouse gases annually than “residents of any other American city, and less than 30 percent of the national average.”
Posts
