PG&E's declining interest in wave power  

Posted by Big Gav in , , ,

GigaOm reports that interest in wave power in California seems to be going all glassy - PG&E Sinks Wave Power.

Looks like California utility PG&E is finally giving up on wave power, for the time being. PG&E’s renewable energy spokesman Denny Boyles tells KQED’s Climate Watch, that the company has essentially abandoned any wave power projects it had been researching, including pilot projects and permits for three areas along the California coast.

It’s not all that shocking. Despite many companies’ best efforts, wave and tidal power installations have been largely stuck in the pilot stage, and bigger projects in particular have faced technical glitches and a lack of funding. According to research done by Black and Veatch (B&V) for the California Renewable Energy Transmission Initiative (RETI) last year, ocean power — both wave and tidal — have one of the highest levelized costs of energy (the cost over the life of the system) out of all the clean energy generation options out there (see graph).

Four years ago, PG&E agreed to buy energy from a wave power project that was going to be built by Finavera, and was slated to become the country’s first commercial wave power project. However state commissioners with the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) decided the technology was too new and the prices too high for a viable project, and approval for the energy procurement contract was denied.

PG&E also scrapped a plan last year to build a 5-MW pilot wave project off the Humboldt County cost in northern California, after finding the project was just too expensive. PG&E had estimated it would cost $50 million just to cover the expenses of installing the infrastructure for the power transmission, monitoring and other equipment. The figure didn’t include the cost of the equipment for converting the wave motion into energy. PG&E also abandoned a plan to build another pilot project off the cost of Mendocino County in Northern California in 2009.

The now-lieutenant governor Gavin Newsom (formerly San Francisco Mayor) has long been calling for a wave project off the California coast in the 2012-2013 time frame. In 2009, San Francisco submitted its own preliminary application to federal regulators for a permit to develop a 10 MW-30 MW project with potential to generate up to 100 MW. For comparison, the PG&E-Finavera deal that the regulators shot down was for just 2 MW.

0 comments

Post a Comment

Ads

Ads

Statistics


referer referrer referers referrers http_referer

Locations of visitors to this page

Ads

Books

Followers

News

Loading...

Blog Archive

Labels

australia (515) global warming (314) peak oil (272) solar power (268) electric vehicles (168) wind power (144) smart grids (138) geothermal energy (133) ocean energy (129) csp (128) tidal power (118) solar thermal power (116) coal seam gas (113) nuclear power (109) iraq (106) oil (105) geothermal power (100) green buildings (99) china (98) renewable energy (92) lng (91) agriculture (81) natural gas (73) smart meters (72) solar pv (71) energy storage (70) oil price (70) biofuel (69) energy efficiency (59) uk (59) wave power (56) electricity grid (52) google (49) food prices (48) big brother (46) coal (46) internet (45) bicycle (40) thin film solar (39) ocean power (37) biomimicry (36) new zealand (34) air transport (33) shale gas (33) water (33) algae (32) canada (32) scotland (32) credit crunch (31) politics (31) queensland (31) bioplastic (30) concentrating solar power (30) surveillance (30) population (27) resource wars (26) batteries (25) california (25) censorship (25) cleantech (25) geoengineering (25) saudi arabia (25) cogeneration (24) ctl (23) drought (23) offshore wind power (23) bruce sterling (22) economics (22) woodside (22) arctic ice (20) coal to liquids (20) iraq oil law (20) origin energy (19) ultracapacitor (19) brightsource (18) indonesia (18) rail transport (18) santos (18) ausra (17) carbon tax (17) lithium (17) ucg (16) buckminster fuller (15) collapse (15) exxon (15) limits to growth (15) mapping (15) psychology (15) concentrating solar thermal power (14) geodynamics (14) iceland (14) michael klare (14) biodiesel (13) carbon emissions (13) cellulosic ethanol (13) distributed manufacturing (13) electric bikes (13) ethanol (13) fertiliser (13) investment (13) kenya (13) tesla (13) ambient energy (12) atlantis (12) cities (12) matthew simmons (12) public transport (12) victoria (12) al gore (11) biochar (11) brazil (11) energy policy (11) shale oil (11) texas (11) bees (10) desertec (10) fabber (10) goldman sachs (10) hybrid car (10) internet of things (10) terra preta (10) tinfoil (10) volt (10) alaska (9) amory lovins (9) biomass (9) carbon trading (9) cradle to cradle (9) esolar (9) gazprom (9) gtl (9) pge (9) severn estuary (9) sweden (9) toyota (9) afghanistan (8) big oil (8) bucky fuller (8) chile (8) eroei (8) fuel cells (8) guerilla gardening (8) linc energy (8) lithium ion batteries (8) methane hydrates (8) otec (8) relocalisation (8) us elections (8) western australia (8) antarctica (7) arrow energy (7) bloom energy (7) boeing (7) climategate (7) copenhagen (7) distributed generation (7) fish (7) floating offshore wind power (7) four day week (7) methane (7) nanosolar (7) vinod khosla (7) apocaphilia (6) bolivia (6) ceramic fuel cells (6) cigs (6) jatropha (6) jeremy leggett (6) local currencies (6) natural gas pipelines (6) nigeria (6) pentland firth (6) somalia (6) stirling engine (6) t boone pickens (6) chp (5) futurism (5) ocean acidification (5) saul griffith (5) varanus island (5) airborne wind turbines (4) garbage (4) kevin kelly (4) low temperature geothermal power (4) oled (4) scenario planning (4) space based solar power (4) tim flannery (4) v2g (4) club of rome (3) global energy grid (2) norman borlaug (2) peak oil portfolio (1)