Subsidies for Nuclear Power And Fossil Fuels Dwarf Those Given To Renewable Energy  

Posted by Big Gav

The Smarter Planet blog has a post showing the vast gap between the flood of government subsidies received by the nuclear and fossil fuel industries in the US compared to the trickle that has been allocated to renewables - Energy subsidy showdown: Fossil fuels, nuclear, biofuels vs. renewables.

Renewable energy has snagged just a fraction of the federal subsidies that fossil fuels and nuclear received when they were emerging technologies, according to a new report from venture capital firm DBL Investors.

The report probably isn’t surprising to renewable energy backers who have long argued that subsidies for fossil fuels make it impossible to compete. And it’s unlikely to settle the debate over ending subsidies for the oil and gas industry. But it does provide a valuable historical view of each energy source and helps explain why they’re so dominant today (check out the charts below).

The analysis was conducted by Nancy Pfund, a managing partner at DBL Investors of San Francisco, and Ben Healy, a Yale graduate student and former staff director for the Massachusetts legislature’s environment and natural resource committee. Pfund and Healy say — as far as they know — they’re the first to quantify exactly how the current federal commitment to renewables compares to support for earlier energy transitions.

To be clear, the analysis has its shortfalls. For example, the authors acknowledge the difficulty of determining what should count as a subsidy. The report also doesn’t quantify the value of renewable energy mandates nor does include state levels subsidies. And the report only takes data up to 2009, meaning stimulus bill money isn’t included.

Even so, the report shows a distinct gap in support between the early days of fossil fuels, nuclear and biofuels and today’s emerging technology of renewable energy. The report tracked the actual dollar subsidies to each sector during the first 30 years of those subsidies’ existence (check out the chart below for an illustration). It found:
Early subsidies to nuclear dwarf all others;
Biofuels subsidies had a consistent, linear trajectory and then jumped significantly after policy changes in the mid-2000s




0 comments

Post a Comment

Ads

Ads

Statistics


referer referrer referers referrers http_referer

Locations of visitors to this page

Ads

Books

Followers

News

Loading...

Blog Archive

Labels

australia (515) global warming (314) peak oil (272) solar power (268) electric vehicles (168) wind power (144) smart grids (138) geothermal energy (133) ocean energy (129) csp (128) tidal power (118) solar thermal power (116) coal seam gas (113) nuclear power (109) iraq (106) oil (105) geothermal power (100) green buildings (99) china (98) renewable energy (92) lng (91) agriculture (81) natural gas (73) smart meters (72) solar pv (71) energy storage (70) oil price (70) biofuel (69) energy efficiency (59) uk (59) wave power (56) electricity grid (52) google (49) food prices (48) big brother (46) coal (46) internet (45) bicycle (40) thin film solar (39) ocean power (37) biomimicry (36) new zealand (34) air transport (33) shale gas (33) water (33) algae (32) canada (32) scotland (32) credit crunch (31) politics (31) queensland (31) bioplastic (30) concentrating solar power (30) surveillance (30) population (27) resource wars (26) batteries (25) california (25) censorship (25) cleantech (25) geoengineering (25) saudi arabia (25) cogeneration (24) ctl (23) drought (23) offshore wind power (23) bruce sterling (22) economics (22) woodside (22) arctic ice (20) coal to liquids (20) iraq oil law (20) origin energy (19) ultracapacitor (19) brightsource (18) indonesia (18) rail transport (18) santos (18) ausra (17) carbon tax (17) lithium (17) ucg (16) buckminster fuller (15) collapse (15) exxon (15) limits to growth (15) mapping (15) psychology (15) concentrating solar thermal power (14) geodynamics (14) iceland (14) michael klare (14) biodiesel (13) carbon emissions (13) cellulosic ethanol (13) distributed manufacturing (13) electric bikes (13) ethanol (13) fertiliser (13) investment (13) kenya (13) tesla (13) ambient energy (12) atlantis (12) cities (12) matthew simmons (12) public transport (12) victoria (12) al gore (11) biochar (11) brazil (11) energy policy (11) shale oil (11) texas (11) bees (10) desertec (10) fabber (10) goldman sachs (10) hybrid car (10) internet of things (10) terra preta (10) tinfoil (10) volt (10) alaska (9) amory lovins (9) biomass (9) carbon trading (9) cradle to cradle (9) esolar (9) gazprom (9) gtl (9) pge (9) severn estuary (9) sweden (9) toyota (9) afghanistan (8) big oil (8) bucky fuller (8) chile (8) eroei (8) fuel cells (8) guerilla gardening (8) linc energy (8) lithium ion batteries (8) methane hydrates (8) otec (8) relocalisation (8) us elections (8) western australia (8) antarctica (7) arrow energy (7) bloom energy (7) boeing (7) climategate (7) copenhagen (7) distributed generation (7) fish (7) floating offshore wind power (7) four day week (7) methane (7) nanosolar (7) vinod khosla (7) apocaphilia (6) bolivia (6) ceramic fuel cells (6) cigs (6) jatropha (6) jeremy leggett (6) local currencies (6) natural gas pipelines (6) nigeria (6) pentland firth (6) somalia (6) stirling engine (6) t boone pickens (6) chp (5) futurism (5) ocean acidification (5) saul griffith (5) varanus island (5) airborne wind turbines (4) garbage (4) kevin kelly (4) low temperature geothermal power (4) oled (4) scenario planning (4) space based solar power (4) tim flannery (4) v2g (4) club of rome (3) global energy grid (2) norman borlaug (2) peak oil portfolio (1)